The Dream of the Intermarium
BSSB.BE cepa.org 24.12.2015
The “Bloodlands,” as the Yale historian Timothy Snyder calls them, stretch from the Baltic to the Black Sea. A less gloomy name is the Intermarium—between the seas. But whatever the name, they share the same, mostly gloomy, story. These countries have no natural frontiers and two much bigger neighbours: Russia and Germany. So they have spent most of European history under the enforced sway of one or the other.
Since the collapse of the Soviet empire, the Bloodlands have turned west. Their peoples want the legality, liberty, prosperity, dignity and other qualities of life that they missed out on under totalitarianism. They see these qualities when they turn West—not specifically to Germany, though, but to the European Union and NATO in which Germany is a strong, but not domineering, force.
They make this choice freely. They could turn east, for strong leadership, stirring messages, and a paternalist political culture. But they mostly do not.
- For the first time in 25 years, another option is on the table. The new Polish government wants the Intermarium to speak for itself, standing up both to Russia and (to some extent) to Germany, whose political weight and economic self-interest make it (supposedly) an inherently unreliable partner.
- The idea is to build the Intermarium around the core Visegrád countries (the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia) but with strong ties to the Baltic states, to Romania and Bulgaria, and to Ukraine. This is superficially tempting. It echoes Polish greatness (actually Polish-Lithuanian, but never mind) many centuries ago, when a long-forgotten superpower stretched from the Baltic to the Black Sea.
But in practice it is unworkable and counter-productive. The Intermarium countries are too divided to form a common front. Hungary is in the hands of the headstrong Victor Orbán who is besotted with the idea of strong leadership (especially his own) and enjoys increasingly warm ties with Vladimir Putin. The Czech and Slovak governments (and especially the Czech President, Miloš Zeman) dislike confronting Russia. Bulgaria is perennially unreliable.
The problem for Poland therefore is that it does not have enough allies in the putative Intermarium to create a critical mass for solidarity and decision-making. It can rely strongly on Estonia, usually on Latvia and Lithuania, and probably on Romania. Ukraine is more in need of help than able to contribute it. America can create this kind of magnetic pull. Poland can’t and should not pretend otherwise. History suggests that Poland’s greatest disasters come when it overestimates its strength.
Of course if Poland were a country of 80 million people, not 40 million, and had a German-sized economy, instead of a Dutch-sized one, the chances would be better. But it doesn’t.
In the real world, European security depends on constant push-back against two tendencies: American isolationism and German neutralism. The concept of the Intermarium is of no interest to the United States (as Polish envoys will find when they raise it). And it is actively harmful with regard to Germany.
It is quite true that German behaviour—for example in diluting NATO’s response to the Kremlin threat, or in building a direct gas pipeline to Russia—is worrying. It is prudent to look at sub-regional security arrangements that can make up for German foot-dragging (such as the Nordic-Baltic-Polish nine increasing cooperation on Baltic Sea security).
But Germany is not an unreliable ally. Angela Merkel is without doubt the Intermarium’s best ally in Western capitals. She has pushed through sanctions against Russia against huge obstacles.
If Poland snubs Germany, it increases, not diminishes, the danger. The answer to German wobbles is to work harder on reducing them, not pursuing imaginary alternatives.
Europe’s Edge is an online journal covering crucial topics in the transatlantic policy debate. All opinions are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the position or views of the Center for European Policy Analysis.
Author: Edward Lucas is a Senior Vice President at the Center for European Policy Analysis (CEPA). Energy, Commodities and Natural Resources editor for The Economist, the London-based newsweekly, he is one of the foremost experts on Russia and Central and Eastern Europe.
- ‘How to Plan a Crusade’ to ‘The Snow Goose’: Christmas book recommendations from Oxford tutors. Oxford tutors offer their suggestions for your Christmas book lists.
- Bill Gates, Crypto-Socialist? Bill Gates is right: the private sector is stifling innovation in green energy. But that’s not the only place capitalism is holding us back. ill Gates, the original tech titan, is going around telling just about anyone who will listen to him that the free market is terrible at innovation.
- World Population by Income. How Many Live on How Much, and Where. The income groups are defined as follows: The poor live on $2 or less daily, low income on $2.01-10, middle income on $10.01-20, upper-middle income on $20.01-50, and high income on more than $50; figures expressed in 2011 purchasing power parities in 2011 prices.
Romania VS Moldova. Eastern Europe Now 20.04.2016 | BSSB
Ukraine. Back in the game 06.02.2017 | BSSB
All-Out War in Ukraine: NATO’s ‘Final Offensive’ – 1... 06.01.2015 | BSSB
Why Putin’s anti-NATO behavior makes sense to him, and many in Russia... 18.11.2014 | BSSB
The Case for Bilateral Talks 24.07.2015 | BSSB
2. Turkey: «Let’s Leave NATO» 04.12.2017 | BSSB
The Crimes of Others 27.04.2015 | BSSB
Public views of NATO countries 22.06.2015 | BSSB
Last Chance for Ukraine 01.04.2015 | BSSB
1 – Europe at a crossroads 15.03.2016 | BSSB
Why Ukraine Must Bargain for Peace With Russia – 2... 09.12.2014 | BSSB
2 – Who is Mr. Orban?! 09.12.2015 | BSSB
- 2. Bad game in the European Globalisation 20.04.2018
- What Central and Eastern Europe can /can not? 19.04.2018
- The European budget talks 18.04.2018
- Preventing International Conflict 17.04.2018
- 2.The wrong buttons for Balkans 17.04.2018
- 1. Bad game in the European Globalisation 16.04.2018
- The Gift of Geopolitics 16.04.2018
- 1. The wrong buttons for Balkans 13.04.2018
- The Geopolitical Map in 2030 13.04.2018
- 2. Hungary in the EU 12.04.2018
- Changes ahead in the global order 12.04.2018
- Special from Chomsky 11.04.2018
- Trade war against Eastern EU 11.04.2018
- Odessa. A heroic fight 10.04.2018
- Hungary in the EU 10.04.2018