2 – The Eurozone: On the Edge of Crisis
- The eurozone’s underlying economic risks have been exacerbated by the political risks facing Europe in the year ahead.
- Recent setbacks in the bloc’s effort to sever the link between banks and their countries’ governments will make the danger to the eurozone more acute.
- New ideas for fixing this “doom loop” are likely to meet stiff resistance from Germany, where national elections are scheduled for September.
In the years since a doom loop triggered by the Greek crisis nearly led to the eurozone’s collapse, authorities have tried (but failed) to break the bond connection between banks and their governments. A German proposal to limit the amount of their own government’s debt that banks can hold has been hotly contested by Italy and Spain, since implementing it would cause massive disruptions to their economies.
Another German-led measure involved the creation of “bail-in” rules, which were adopted at the start of 2016. They required that a troubled bank’s private debtholders absorb its losses first, essentially losing their investment, before government money could be used to bail it out.
The first major test of these rules came in December, when the long-ailing Banca Monte Dei Paschi di Siena — Italy’s third-largest bank — ran into serious trouble and needed a bailout. But many of the bank’s debtholders were unsuspecting private citizens who had been sold the debt as a safe savings vehicle. Forcing them to take a loss with a bail-in would have spurred a major political backlash, strengthening the hand of Euroskeptic parties such as the Five Star Movement.
The Italian government’s solution to shield itself from the political fallout involved two sleights of hand. First, it used a nearly out-of-date stress test from mid-2016 to justify a more favorable type of recapitalization. Then, armed with the excuse that debtholders had been misled about the nature of their investment, it reimbursed them. Rome’s tactics saved the bank, at least for the time being, and prevented a substantial public outcry.
The European Commission, no doubt also worried about the ramifications of strengthening Euroskeptic parties, signed off on the plan. Nevertheless, the situation is not entirely resolved: European authorities must still approve a business plan for the bank before the bailout can proceed. The bail-in rules, moreover, seem to have fallen at their first hurdle, while the potential doom loop between banks and their governments remains intact.
Europe Explores New Solutions
The existing fix for the doom loop appears to be failing, but European authorities have not stopped searching for ways to correct it. In January, the European Banking Authority suggested the creation of a Europe-wide “bad bank” that could buy nonperforming loans from EU banks to get them off the banks’ balance sheets, thereby improving the sector’s financial health. The bad bank would then sell those loans to investors. If it took a loss on any of its transactions, it could theoretically seek reimbursement from the originating bank so that the plan’s original backers would not lose money.
Another idea first floated in October 2011 has also been gaining traction lately: the creation of European safe bonds, or ESBies. Under this plan, an entity (private or public) would buy the bonds of all eurozone countries and create two pools: one for riskier economies and another for safer ones. It would then issue bonds representing the risky debt pool (preliminarily named European junior bonds, or EJBies, containing debt from countries such as Greece and Portugal) and others for the safer pool (with debt from countries such as Germany and the Netherlands).
This pooling could make it harder for investors to pick one country to desert in a crisis while also creating a larger pool of truly safe assets that investors could rely on. In September, the European Systemic Risk Board, headed by ECB President Mario Draghi, created a task force to explore the idea, and the European Commission is expected to publish a white paper on it in March.
Unfortunately for the plans’ architects, Germany — the eurozone’s most influential voice — has raised objections to both ideas. The German public is strongly opposed to any proposal that might involve subsidizing the indebted south with its tax money. Over the past few years, Germany has taken steps to insulate itself from the eurozone’s potential dissolution.
When the ECB launched its bond-buying program in January 2015, for example, Germany finally relented to a policy it had disagreed with on the condition that the bonds continued to be divided among members’ central banks rather than pooled centrally, making the arrangement clearer in the event of a future divorce. More subtly, data from the Bank for International Settlements has shown that German banks have stopped lending to companies based elsewhere in the eurozone in recent years, preferring instead to keep their money inside Germany — another step away from integration and liability mutualization within the bloc. So, any idea that appears to involve risk pooling will probably receive short shrift in Germany, especially during an election year.
Will the Eurozone Survive the Year?
The eurozone has entered a difficult year, and some investors are showing more and more doubt in its ability to survive. If Europe successfully leaps the political hurdles that lie ahead, uncertainty in the market should rapidly fade, returning money to its bond markets. But even if that does happen, economic risks (made worse by political factors on the Continent) will continue to feed fears for the currency union’s future.
European bond yields are rising, buoyed by global expectations of inflation and by the ECB’s gradually tightening monetary policy, which means that debt repayments will also rise. If they continue to do so gradually, bond yields are unlikely to reach uncomfortable levels during 2017. But because the doom loop between banks and their governments is still intact, and because the Italian banking sector is still extremely fragile, Italy will be highly prone to crisis. And upticks in debt repayments, no matter how gradual, will only increase its vulnerability.
Geopolitics Nations Parties Person Crisis Euroskeptic Society Youtube
*YOUTUBE — The Netherlands welcomes Trump in his own words. The whole world was watching for the inauguration of the 45th president of the United States: Donald J. Trump. Because we realize it’s better for us to get along, we decided to introduce our tiny country to him. In a way that will probably appeal to him the most.
*YOUTUBE — Belgium welcomes Trump in his own words.After the Netherland’s Video, Belgium wanted to present itself to Donald Trump as well, so here we go.
*YOUTUBE —https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=reuJ8yVCgSM —Switzerland Second (official) | DEVILLE LATE-NIGHT
«Practical wisdom» 10.04.2015 | BSSB
1 – Decisive year for Europe. To be or not to be... 16.12.2016 | BSSB
No illusions 24.07.2015 | BSSB
FORGET GREECE — WATCH UKRAINE 13.08.2015 | BSSB
Crossroads of Liquidity and Volatility 03.04.2015 | BSSB
Reform or Divorce in Europe 23.08.2016 | BSSB
The Dollar and the Currency Wars 04.05.2015 | BSSB
«Disunited States of Europe» 12.12.2017 | BSSB
1 – The Eurozone: On the Edge of Crisis 15.02.2017 | BSSB
An Empire Strikes Back 14.07.2015 | BSSB
2 – Decisive year for Europe. To be or not to be... 19.12.2016 | BSSB
The low-hanging fruit 15.05.2015 | BSSB
- 2. Three Seas Initiative in action 23.03.2018
- A Dual Approach to Europe’s Future 23.03.2018
- Global Risks in Turbulent Times 22.03.2018
- 2.The EU as seen from Serbia 22.03.2018
- Intermarium cooperation 21.03.2018
- 1.Three Seas Initiative in action 21.03.2018
- KAPLAN: ‘In Europe’s Shadow’ 20.03.2018
- 1.The EU as seen from Serbia 20.03.2018
- Brzezinski is reading «between the lines» 19.03.2018
- 1. Western Plan for Eastern countries 19.03.2018
- 1. Mysterious Danube identity 16.03.2018
- Why nations fail 16.03.2018
- 2. Moldova: in the grey zone of Europe 15.03.2018
- 1.The ‘Big Lie’ 15.03.2018
- 1. Eastern Voices 14.03.2018