Plahotniuc, the richest man from Moldova
The sight of a billionaire businessman capturing power is familiar to the citizens of Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia. A big part of Eastern Europe lives in a place where business and politics fuse, and politics is much more about how to build businesses rather than build institutions, writes the expert in the Eastern European space Thomas de Waal, Senior at the Carnegie Europe Center, in an analysis published in the Financial Times.
“Since Donald Trump won the US election, there has been anxiety over what the tycoon’s victory means for eastern Europe. Even before Mr Trump won the White House, much of eastern Europe was living in Trumpland, where business and politics are fused and politics is more about making deals than building institutions. The sight of a billionaire businessman capturing power is familiar to the citizens of Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia. Each is run, formally or informally, by a wealthy tycoon”, affirms the political expert.
Bidzina Ivanishvili, the former prime minister and the godfather of the ruling party Georgian Dream, is estimated to be worth about $5bn, more than one-third of Georgia’s gross domestic product. At the same time, the Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko is one of the wealthiest men in his country.
In Moldova, the oligarch who has captured the power is Vladimir Plahotniuc, writes the Financial Times.
“Vladimir Plahotniuc, Moldova’s richest man, is also its de facto leader, while Petro Poroshenko, Ukraine’s president, is one of the wealthiest men in his country. For years, Moldova was known as eastern Europe’s “champion of reform”. It was granted visa-free travel and an association agreement with the EU before any of its neighbours. Yet on November 13 Moldova apparently rejected Europe by electing Igor Dodon, a pro-Russian socialist, to the post of president, a position with limited constitutional powers but symbolic importance”, Thomas de Waal claims.
According to the expert, the reason for this protest vote is systemic corruption which the EU and US failed to check and which culminated in the revelation in 2015 that $1bn, equivalent to one-sixth of Moldova’s GDP, had been siphoned from three banks, with the alleged connivance of top officials.
“Iurie Leanca, Moldova’s then head of government, responded to the scandal by saying that he was “just a prime minister”. That is because real power in Moldova lies with Mr Plahotniuc. Even if Moldova does not tilt back geopolitically towards Moscow, it risks a situation just as bad — being an unreformed grey zone on the margins of Europe”, the expert writes.
Ukraine presents a similar challenge but on a much bigger scale, is also told in the analysis. “Mr Poroshenko has instigated more reforms in two years than his predecessors did in 20, overhauling the police force, the energy sector and the public procurement system. But he also displays a firm resolve not to reform any institutions that could threaten him personally.
Opinion polls routinely show that corruption has eroded the trust of Ukrainians in their leaders. Recent asset declarations by officials — with the prime minister declaring no fewer than 12 luxury watches — only reinforce this weary cynicism, which could empower populist or pro-Russian parties at the next election”, is also told in the analysis published by the Financial Times.
EUROSCEPTICISM Nations Conflicts Crisis Army Person Economy Youtube
*Youtuube —- Robert B Kaplan and “The Revenge of Geography» Robert D. Kaplan, chief geopolitical analyst for Stratfor, a private global intelligence firm, delivers his talk, “The Revenge of Geography: What the Map Tells Us About Coming Conflicts and the Battle Against Fate.” This is also the title of his latest book, published by Random House in 2012. Kaplan has been a foreign correspondent for The Atlantic for over 25 years. In both 2011 and 2012, Foreign Policy magazine named Kaplan among the world’s 100 Top Global Thinkers.
*Youtbe — Brussels Forum 2016: Epilogue: A Conversation with Robert D. Kaplan . Mr. Robert D. Kaplan, Senior Fellow, Center for a New American Security Moderator: Mr. Nik Gowing, International Broadcaster
*Youtube — https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QvI6WfsF_FQ . In the short term, one of the biggest winners in the Iran deal is China, and the biggest loser is Saudi Arabia, says Carnegie Endowment’s Karim Sadjadpour. But 10, 15 years from now, we may see that the deal was a seminal factor in reintegrating Iran into the global political economy and strengthening civil society–making the U.S. and Europe the winners and countries like Russia and Syria the losers.